Biaxin Taste In Mouth

someone who has a closed conception of the world, a unique perspective of coexistence, and which encourages an apostolic aiming to spread the truth that is bearer. Therefore, a fundamentalist, strictly speaking, can not be democratic, and democratic fundamentalism, as previously suggested, defines a paradoxical and contradictory in itself. But not as much, if we do not behave precisely as fundamentalists in the analysis and description of democracy: if we accept that this is precisely an unscientific method, and yes very conventional, to articulate the government of the people, organize a system of coexistence and to resolve or reduce conflicts without appeal to violence, and moral relativism that aliewhat he believes are corrupting the system, the highway robbers who have taken over tort of power, overturning the myth can town government and the people for a masquerade at the service of the privileged.

authoritarian movements often sign such complaints often wield far more if accompanied by an illusion of modernization. And although many do not want to recognize, drink with astonishing ease in social and psychological origins of fascism, always in need of accommodating collective myths to their own insecurity of individuals within a community subdued and mediocre. As Wilhelm Reich says, "the fascist mentality is that of small Carambare, miserable, subdued, eager to rebel authorities while ... This little man too well mimics the behavior of the big man and plays distorted and magnified. "

This little man, eager to join the democratic fashion, even subjectively admirer of the political systems that embody them, confuses too often, even unknowingly, to the environment or, as the thoroughbred, bacon with speed. Democracy fails, for him, a method of coexistence, to become a supreme goal and ideal. The rule of law, equality before the same are not stable conditions and rules of the game, but transmuted into a kind of mechanistic adherence to establisheddo so by the Constitution, the supreme law of social organization, but questionable and transformable, threatens to become a sacred text of an almost immutable, thus perverting its status based instrument to emphasize its character as revealed book (revealed, I say, by politicians to citizens).



democratic fundamentalism is a disease of the system that meets the vices of democracy talks and arrogant, as it is generated in a confluence of both, and almost none or very few of its virtues. It affects mainly supporters of the first, but learned very quickly who exercise the second. Like any mystification, no longer a theatricality, a simulation inmunda some use in their pursuit of power. We can not say that his supporters are not Democrats, even if they do not have the passion to be: his methods are, perhaps because the existing reality does not allow different choice, or even by choice, but they are not your emotions.

the extent that the current system gives them the limits of legality, which becomes an obsession for them to legalistic, authoritarian tendencies are restrained and nuanced, although it should be noted that not there is an absolute and automatic match between democratic and rule of law. Heirs of many traditions of democracy organic undemocratic as the dlike fever.

In the famous Dreyfus case was a perfect example of the contribution of newspapers that monstrous coven that took the liberty, honor, and the French military career.

The Dreyfus case was primarily a problem of public opinion. At all stages of development we are, more or less, with the press. No press faithful echo of a drama that is alien, but the party press, education, aggressive, good, bad faith, the press "infamous" ... The false press releases to pick up, thanks to the denials, new tracks. Replaces justice, police and even parliament. Exercises all the blackmail, all said to justtions, sometimes together the energy and, if necessary, disperse, the entertaining, then resume them indefinitely. "

When a press and colluded with the interests of a party or a political class and has with the complicity of sections of the law, where does it on behalf of an almost univocal concept of democracy, upholding the best of the arguments of the single thought against the fallibility of the opponent, democratic fundamentalism has come a long way.

responses Democracy was built on an unholy alliance of journalists, politicians and some judges, willing to behave like an angel killerall the ills of democracy of the doubt, once covered the power, with all its consequences, the pride that promote absolute majorities, tendencies to implement a single thought in the various fields of coexistence "than terrorism or the economy, education or national security-are beginning to wreak havoc among the bewildered citizens. They wonder how it is possible that after nearly three decades of democratic rule, has been renewed so little social power in their country, and there are those who will speak again with aplomb, from the stands, of Spain
a large,
free.

democratic fundamentalism is a disease of democracy, but also a loveaza for continuity. Convictions comfortable around those who practice it, unable to question the ultimate nature and value of their actions, as they are convinced they are right. His followers often bartered with the flexibility and dialogue by opportunism and spin ", so to obtain and retain power, knowing that it was his strength of conviction is low, and give to their lackeys, like all fundamentalist doctrines , the sky of happiness and satisfaction of accomplishment. In the formal respect to immovable rigidity hidden rules, based on principles of deep roots and little dialectic.

And in the constant and blatant appeal to the manipulation of mass cCOMMUNICATION, pervert the critical role they have, turning them into rams of desire and vociferous spokespersons of intolerance that is exercised, bitter, loud, shockingly, no less than in the name of freedom. When a democracy is strong and solid, like the English, is based on clear principles, built on appropriate institutions and supported by a favorable international environment, the possibilities that this new, paradoxical and ironic fundamentalism prevails as to the true system of liberties are minimal .

But proliferate, however, skirmishes, attacks the smugness and anxieties, so that some victims are left on the road, not always silent witnessesattempts to assault on reason doubting the conviction of certainty. This has been very clearly when implementing the policy against fundamentalism ETA terrorist and criminal. Emphasizing the links between it and all kinds of nationalism, rather than emphasizing the clear distances between democratic parties extraction of a band of gunmen fascists, the PP has done nothing but add more twitches to a situation already very tense.

Declaring PNV and ETA are at bottom the same, because they serve the same purpose, the independence of Euskadi, democratic fundamentalism uncovered one of the most troubling symptoms of sick comprehensioneto righteousness proceeding from fanaticism, flexibility of approach, shameless opportunism, and governance of the peoples of the sentimental appeal to the masses, is the task of those who know what has united the human race since its inception have been the questions. In the plurality of responses is of course precisely the privilege and the strength of democracies. A plurality root that is denied by fundamentalism. Although endeavor to disguise themselves, useless and embarrassing, democratic.